I am so relieved that it hasn't come to literally suing people for riping CDs that they legally own. I swear, I don't want to think about what would happen if the RIAA managed to get away with that.

As far as DRM-free music goes, the RIAA was on a smear campaign a while ago trying to convince people that the only legal DRM-free music out there is by some Indy-Artist that you have never heard of, something that is patently untrue; which shows that the RIAA definitely does not like DRM-free music.

This begs the question, at what point are they going to come out and say, "Purchasing unprotected music is illegal because it is technically bypassing DRM" or something stupid like that? And if they do, how are they going to justify this egregious stance?